Apple Files Lawsuit Over Jon Prosser’s iOS 26 Leaks, Alleges Trade Secret Theft

CUPERTINO, CA –Apple Inc. has launched a major lawsuit against prominent tech YouTuber Jon Prosser, a step that demonstrates its hardline stance on corporate secrecy. The core of this legal battle is the Apple lawsuit over Jon Prosser iOS 26 leaks, with the company alleging that Prosser and an associate engaged in a calculated scheme to steal and publicize trade secrets related to the unreleased operating system.

Apple vs. Prosser: Cupertino Files Explosive Lawsuit Over iOS 26 Leaks, Alleging Betrayal and Trade Secret Theft

Prosser and his associate, Michael Ramacciotti, are the targets of a lawsuit filed this Friday, July 18, 2025, in the Northern District of California. It accuses them of misappropriating confidential information that accurately detailed the look and feel of iOS 26 months before its official unveiling at WWDC 2025. This aggressive legal action signals a potential shift in how Silicon Valley giants combat the persistent culture of tech leaks.

What Sparked the Lawsuit: A Deep Dive into the iOS 26 Leaks

The legal action from Apple stems directly from several videos that appeared on Jon Prosser’s influential YouTube channel, Front Page Tech. These videos featured meticulously “re-created renderings” that provided the public with its first glimpse of iOS 26.

The accuracy of these leaks is what reportedly triggered Apple’s internal investigation and subsequent legal action. Key details revealed by Prosser included:

• A New “Liquid Glass” Design: Prosser showcased the signature aesthetic of iOS 26, featuring translucent, glass-like menus and distinctive pill-shaped navigation bars.
• Overhauled Core Apps: His renderings correctly predicted a redesigned Camera app with a more intuitive interface and an updated Messages app with rounded keyboard corners and buttons.

While minor discrepancies existed, the concepts were so similar to the final product that they lent immense credibility to Prosser’s channel. While simultaneously undermining Apple’s carefully orchestrated product reveal strategy. The iOS 26 leaks were no longer just rumors; they were a substantive preview of a secret product, forming the basis for the current lawsuit.

Apple’s Complaint: How the Leaks Allegedly Occurred

The court filing details a dramatic narrative of how the confidential information was allegedly obtained. Apple claims the source was a development iPhone in the possession of one of its engineers, Ethan Lipnik. The complaint alleges that his friend, Michael Ramacciotti, exploited this friendship to gain access to the device.

Apple’s legal team alleges that Ramacciotti first obtained Lipnik’s passcode. And then utilized location tracking to ascertain when the engineer would be away from home. He then allegedly used the development iPhone to initiate a FaceTime call with Jon Prosser. And providing a live demonstration of iOS 26. Prosser is accused of recording this call and using the footage as the primary source material for his published leaks. This direct peek at a confidential product is a central claim in the Apple lawsuit over Jon Prosser iOS 26 leaks.

Apple Sues Jon Prosser Over iOS 26 Leaks https://t.co/4q4LZyc0p7 pic.twitter.com/Lg1zxqYzre

— MacRumors.com (@MacRumors) July 18, 2025

The Fallout and Apple’s Demands

The repercussions have been significant. Ethan Lipnik, the engineer, has been dismissed from his position at Apple due to violations of company policy.

In its lawsuit, the central issue in Apple’s complaint is a collection of videos featured on Front Page Tech. Jon Prosser runs the popular YouTube channel. Furthermore, the company is demanding financial damages for the theft and dissemination of its valuable intellectual property. The complaint also notes that the development device contained secrets beyond the iOS 26 interface. Raising concerns at Apple that Prosser may have further unrevealed information about future products.

Responding to the allegations, Jon Prosser has made a public statement on social media. He is unaware of the “scheme” Apple describes. And also prepared to address the matter directly.

Although this Apple lawsuit is poised to become a landmark case. Testing the boundaries between tech journalism and trade secret law. Outcome could establish a powerful new precedent, influencing how information flows out of the world’s most secretive companies. And how the media reports on it.